In fact I enjoyed reading it so much, that a few pages into the copy Penguin sent me, I headed over to Kobo and ponied up my own dough and bought an e-version so that I could read it that much more often by using it to make my recumbent bike interval training, not just bearable, but something I even kinda, sorta looked forward to.
You see Tim's book is something I'm not sure I've ever read before. I'd describe it as an "evidence-based romp" (words that I'd never thought I'd string together) and his clean writing and his truly delightful and delicious self-deprecating brand of humour makes you want to pick it up again and again.
Tim covers a fair bit of ground in his personalized debunking of the scads of bunk we face when considering self-improvement projects like fitness, diet, genetics, and chronic disease prevention. And when I say personalized, I mean it in that Tim takes himself through his own anecdotal n=1 journey through celebrity trainers, dieting (back to that in a moment), colonics, personalized gene testing, accupuncture and homeopathy.
I actually bookmarked huge swaths of the book with the intent of sharing with you some favourite passages, but sitting here now and writing this review, I don't want to. Not because I'm lazy, but because I don't want to spoil your read.
I will however point out the one area where the book and I disagree rather conclusively. Diet. I say, "the book", rather than Tim, because Tim and I met last October at the Canadian Obesity Network's conference and we took the opportunity to chat quite a bit and over the course of our discussion, I think I may have swayed him some from the success=suffering formula presented in the book. Personally I don't believe in white knuckling through hunger and cravings on an ongoing basis and rather encourage consuming the healthiest diet you can actually enjoy, and not striving for the healthiest diet you can tolerate, while simultaneously using time, macronutrients and sufficencies of calories to try to turn off physiologically driven dietary drive. I also think he gave Canada's Food Guide pretty much a free pass, though to be fair, weight loss was more the focus of the chapter than formal evidence based nutrition.
Diet notwithstanding, the book's undeniably fabulous. I couldn't recommend it more highly.
Tim, in a tribute to where you spent much of your time writing, close at hand while writing this review was an ice cold beer.
(If you'd like, you can follow Tim on Twitter)
[If you're in Canada, here's the Amazon.ca link.
If you're in the USA, you can pre-order on Amazon over here]





I so wish you posted this yesterday! I just placed an order via Chapters for a few books including the one by Alex Hutchinson that you recommended a few posts back. Sigh. Oh well..guess I'll have to do a separate order for this one.
ReplyDeleteSince my WLS I've been absolutely fascinated with books on health and exercise - especially those that debunk myths and tell it like it really is!
You had me at "evidence based." Thanks for the recommendation; I'm pre-ordering now.
ReplyDelete2 things:
ReplyDelete1. Dr. Yoni, you should write the chapter on weight loss that Tim Caulfield should have written for The Cure for Everything...
2. My own version of the cure for (practically) everything is much shorter than this book:
Water, Ice, Exercise. Am I right?
I don't want to spoil the answer Linda! It's worth reading.
DeleteThis looks like an interesting read. I may just have to check this one out. Also, I see that the author is from the University of Alberta - very cool!
ReplyDeleteGiven that you disagree with the section on diet, would this be a book you would recommend to your clients?
Not as a means to help with their weight, no - though it's not a complete and totally unshared path he takes. But as a great read, absolutely.
DeleteLoved this book! Bought it last month (did you tweet about it?).
ReplyDeletemmm, my concern is that the area that you're most informed on, issues of diet, is the area you think is weakest in the book.
ReplyDeleteI wonder if that's simply coincidence, or do specialists in the other areas the book covers also have reservations about what's wrote in those bits?
I know I always get nervous when I read an article I really like in a newspaper or such, but I recognize several flaws in areas I know something about. Perhaps I'm just not seeing the mistakes in the other bits?
Wait a second, I heard that n=1 projects were a waste and provide no useful information...I think I heard it on Dr. Oz a few years back.
ReplyDeleteWill definitely get a version, likely of the "e" variety. Thanks for the review! Cheers -- Mark :-)