Wednesday, August 14, 2013

The American College of Cardiology's Torrid New Love Affair with Coca-Cola

The mind boggles.

Last month in Forbes Larry Husten detailed how according to the American College of Cardiology's (ACC) Board of Trustees, Coca-Cola and, "its brand fit with the ACC's goals and values", and later how the ACC has tapped Coca-Cola to pay for ACC branded educational programs for its members. Well guess what? Now the ACC is foisting its love affair with Coca-Cola on young families.

Above is a screen capture from the ACC's Cardio Smart page highlighting their promotion of, "Coca-Cola Family Field Day". The event description notes a non-surprising focus on physical activity, and also notes that a Coca-Cola Open Happiness Truck will be in attendance.

Don't know what an Open Happiness Truck is? Here's a video of one such truck in Asia.



But even if the ACC hosted and promoted event didn't have a truck handing out Coca-Cola to children and tying Coca-Cola's brand and beverages to happiness, sport, and by extension of the ACC's involvement, health, have a peek at what else the ACC is promoting by taking a look at the banner just below the Family Field Day description.


That banner, stating, "Balancing Calories with Physical Activity. What is Weighing Us Down? Calorie Imbalance Impacts Us All" when clicked, takes you directly to an ACC hosted, but Coca-Cola designed, infographic. An infographic that anyone who took a moment's time to consider it was able to see right through - including Alanna Nunez from Shape Magazine who had this to say,
"As part of its "Coming Together" campaign, a program that aims to help consumers and their families make smarter choices, Coca-Cola just released a new infographic that blames the obesity epidemic on chicken dishes, bread, and grain-based desserts (while conveniently omitting the fact that the No. 4 source of calories in the standard American diet comes from soda, energy drinks, and sports drinks).

The graphic also highlights the old, outdated idea that "calories in" versus "calories out" equals weight loss...while ignoring that not all calories are created equal. After all, 400 calories of pizza or soda is different than a 400-calorie sandwich made from lean turkey, avocado slices, tomatoes, and whole-grain bread.
"
The venerable and lovely Marion Nestle also took this infographic to task on her blog,
"The infographic gives no guidance about food choices or amounts best for health, but it is quite specific about physical activity. Do lots!

Overall, I read the infographic as saying “Hey, it’s not our sugar-water that’s making you put on weight. It’s up to you to choose what you drink and work it off with physical activity.”

Getting active is always good advice, but doesn’t Coke’s phenomenally comprehensive and astronomically expensive marketing offensive have anything to do with food choices? Coke must think all that is irrelevant.

I think it’s quite relevant. And so does the research.
"
And so here we have a family day where the ACC actively polishes Coca-Cola's image, is directly involved in the distribution of Coca-Cola's products, and where Coca-Cola's own blatantly self-serving and self-exonerating infographic is being presented to readers as a formal ACC educational aid.

So what's going to happen on "Family Field Day"? Probably something akin to what happened on the ACC and Coca-Cola's springtime "Family Track Walk" - a video of which the ACC has posted. Keep your eyes open for the Coca-Cola products (including those being consumed by children) and consider the emotional branding opportunities this collaboration provided Coca-Cola in terms of joy, health, and happiness.



Anyone want to take a guess as to why the ACC would partner with Coca-Cola?

Yup, dollars, plain and simple.

Here's the immediate past ACC Board of Governors Chair Dr. Dipti Itchhaporia and current chair Dr. David May with their ACC posted video that expresses their and the ACC's extreme gratitude to Coca-Cola's coffers:



You know I've got nothing against Coca-Cola aggressively promoting its brand, that's the nature of a free market, I just can't fathom how Drs. May and Itchhaporia sleep at night knowing they're leading the ACC, and by extension all of its members, in helping Coca-Cola to do so.

Any ACC members there care to weigh in our this? Do the ends justify the means? Would love to hear what you (and everyone else) has to say.

Bookmark and Share

9 comments:

  1. Wow, Coke really is going on the offensive on all fronts these days. I just read this article in the Toronto Star yesterday about how they are trying to "educate" people on the safety of aspartame in their beverages: http://www.thestar.com/business/2013/08/13/cocacola_to_defend_safety_of_aspartame_in_new_ad.html
    Like you said, it's a free market and they can promote their products however they want, but when they start partnering with organizations that are supposed to be looking out for our health, it makes you wonder who you can actually trust for information.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sounds like the AND (Academy of Nutrition & Dietetics) group now. Dietitians have a group on Facebook protesting the "junk food" alliances: https://www.facebook.com/DietitiansForProfessionalIntegrity

    ReplyDelete
  3. Reminds me of when the AMA used to take money from cigarette companies: http://kyhealthykids.com/2013/02/11/tobacco-flashbacks-coke-and-pepsi-sponsor-academy-of-nutrition-and-dietetics/

    ReplyDelete
  4. These types of partnerships are EXTREMELY deceptive to people who don't know any different. People are still under the misguided assumption that fat is unhealthy and sugar water (soda) is just fattening. Few realize the underlying systemic inflammation that all this sugar causes. This Coke nonsense is no different than the Vitamin Water craze. These things are loaded with sugar with a few added synthetic vitamins, and an unknowing public is lured into believing this is healthy. Then combine all this nonsense with the grain-centric diet plan sponsored by the NIH, FDA, USDA, et al, and it's no wonder we're only getting sicker and fatter as a nation.

    More information of interest: http://www.michaelmorning.com/2012/09/are-grains-really-healthy-part-1/

    ReplyDelete
  5. Do the ends justify the means?

    ...what ends? The only ends I can see are negative: Coke gets good publicity, people associate Coke with fitness, people actually believe all the "calorie imbalance" nonsense. I guess you could claim "more money for health organizations" as a benefit, but is that really so good when those health organizations are just spreading propaganda for Coke?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous6:20 pm

    This is ridiculous. It is so difficult to find answers to healthy diet question as it is. Even for smart educated people the mixed messages and flat out lies being told to the public through what seems to be reliable honest sources is insane. Money talks and the companies just don’t care who they hurt.

    ReplyDelete
  7. John U5:13 pm

    ["After all, 400 calories of pizza or soda is different than a 400-calorie sandwich made from lean turkey, avocado slices, tomatoes, and whole-grain bread."]

    Dr. Yoni, I think there is merit in what you are doing with this web site, but why did you have to say "lean" turkey above, when there is nothing wrong with "fat" turkey, especially since you have already limited the calories to 400? Fat is good for you, even saturated fat. Please stop the bias.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Because it is not my practice to edit the words of others - in this case Alanna Nunez'

      Delete
    2. John U4:52 pm

      Sorry, read the column too quickly - I will be more careful in the future.

      Delete