Wednesday, March 10, 2010

Do artificial sweeteners enhance fullness?


Judging by our growing waistlines probably not, but I'm reporting on this study to support a point.

The study, a small one published in the journal Diabetes Care in December of last year, investigated blood levels of GLP-1 (a satiety peptide which when produced increases satiety), glucose and insulin in 22 healthy weight individuals following the ingestion of diet soda or carbonated water prior to the consumption of 75grams of glucose.

The findings?

Following ingestion of artificially sweetened beverages the subsequent ingestion of a sugar load led to enhanced release of GLP-1.

So can anybody draw real life conclusions from this study?

Nope. The study's small, it didn't look at actual satiety and there are many more components to diet soda than just artificial sweeteners.

So why did I bother to post?

When it comes to artificial sweeteners it seems to me that the media and blogosphere tends to report based on the visceral belief that artificial sweeteners must be bad for us and that belief supersedes good evidence based reporting and leads folks to report on bad, preliminary or weak studies as evidence that sweeteners are unhealthy. The corollary to this is that bloggers and the media, while regularly trumpeting results from small studies as vilifying for sweeteners virtually ignore studies that suggest perhaps sweeteners aren't so bad or in some cases perhaps even good.

Me?

While I don't have any disclosures to make regarding ownership of shares or income streams from the sweetener industry my take on the weight of the evidence places the consumption of excess amounts of sugar as a riskier behaviour than the consumption of artificial sweeteners.

The point of this post? To remind my fellow nutrition bloggers, writers and readers that evidence trumps belief.

Before/when writing/reading a blog post or article consider the underlying study and ask yourself whether or not it's important enough to care about. Rat and mice studies, studies with very small numbers of folks, poorly controlled studies - certainly they can be interesting and can also point the way to future research, but please don't hang your hats on them.

Brown RJ, Walter M, & Rother KI (2009). Ingestion of diet soda before a glucose load augments glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion. Diabetes care, 32 (12), 2184-6 PMID: 19808921

Bookmark and Share

5 comments:

  1. Read:
    Wolf, Bray, and Popkin, (2008) "A short history of beverages and how our body treats them" Obesity Reviews, (9): 151-164.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yoni,

    I think the following applies:

    "My take is that at its heart this is exchange is about ... philosophy or science. ... in science, empirical observation wins. I side with science."
    (I can't remember where this quote is from, sorry)

    Brandon

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yoni,

    Thanks. There are far too many "studies" being performed. Sadly, many new studies are coming out that demonstrate that many meds people take cause very bad side affects. The most recent one is about Fosamax.

    My saying is: Invest in your body and it will pay daily dividends.

    Keep up the good work.

    Ken Leebow
    Feed Your Head
    www.feedyourheaddiet.com

    ReplyDelete
  4. I don't use a lot of sweeteners.

    BTW, I'm here via Canada Blog Friends.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I recently looked at some cookie recipes with values calculated for sugar or for artificial sweetener. The differences in calories, carbohydrates, and nutritional value was functionally negligible, suggesting that if there's a significant difference to be had, it's in reducing the large-scale consumption of products that have high amounts of added sugars -- and by swearing off pop and cookies.

    ReplyDelete