Wednesday, March 09, 2011

Canada's new childhood obesity strategy wastes valuable time


Continuing in their proud tradition of ignoring their own recommendations, on Monday the Canadian Government unveiled the establishment of a "national dialogue" on childhood obesity.

The "dialogue" aims to ask Canadians what we should do about childhood obesity.

Now I'm not knocking Canadians, but can you think of any other public health crisis where the Government's sole "action" involved a, what-do-you-think-we-should-do national campaign, where we're asking questions like,

"Are you between 13-18 years of age? Share an idea in the Youth Forum"
Does Canada really need a, "Youth Forum"? While engaging Canadians isn't in of itself a bad idea, are we truly that completely clueless on what actual steps might be helpful in reducing the burden of childhood obesity?

Of course not. In fact in 2006 the Canadian Government's Standing Committee on Health heard months of expert testimony (including mine) on the problem of childhood obesity. Those consultations resulted in the publication of their March 2007 report, Healthy Weights for Healthy Kids, which in turn provided 8 pages of concrete recommendations, and the establishment of a, "national dialogue" on childhood obesity wasn't one of them.

So what did they recommend?

To summarize:


  • More research into childhood obesity
  • More funding for advertising campaigns designed to educate about childhood obesity
  • A call to implement the findings of the trans-fat task force
  • Research on the special needs of first nations Canadians in the battle on obesity
  • Improvement of nutrition labeling
  • Better data collection for research
  • The sharing of data with health professionals
  • The identification of what will become the "lead agency" on childhood obesity in Canada
  • The finding of means to reduce the costs of "nutritious" foods to the more remote parts of Canada
  • The tracking of children's' involvements in sports
  • Improvement of school health and fitness curricula
  • New funding for improved infrastructure in schools for healthy fitness and food choices
  • The evaluation of the efficacy of the ban against advertising to children in Quebec.

    And have they followed through with even one of those recommendations?

    Not that I'm aware of.

    The time for dialogue is long gone. The time for action is here. Yet instead of action, instead of actually following through with the recommendations that our tax money has already paid for, Leona Aglukkaq and the Harper Government have chosen to do absolutely nothing, and instead replace actual action with ridiculous, feel good lip service that will ultimately do more to waste time than to do good.


  • Bookmark and Share

    3 comments:

    1. Why this wasn't done 10 years ago is beyond me. It's almost like an inevitable problem has finally arrived and everyone acts like they didn't see it coming. Poor organisation and ignorance people!

      Cheers for the article guys.

      ReplyDelete
    2. How about teaching families how to cook, teaching home ec in schools again so all kids can learn how to cook (not just opening cans and plastic bags and cardboard boxes)? How about bringing back gym class, afterschool teams - a cross country club, basketball club, tennis club, gym meets, etc.? Kids today get little or no exercise during school hours. The government has implimented a subsidy program for low income parents to get kids involved in sports, but most people either don't know about it or don't know how to access it.

      There is a lot the government could be doing.

      ReplyDelete
    3. Time for action...you are so correct in this. What are we all "weighting" for?

      ReplyDelete