Take for instance Justin Sherwood. Mr. Sherwood is the President of the Canadian Beverage Association and just this week he was tasked with defending sugar as a contributor to obesity, diabetes and heart disease.
Let's review Mr. Sherwood's letter, but seen through the lens of Kelly Brownell and Kenneth Warner's Big Tobacco Playbook - whereby they came up with a list of plays that the food industry has co-opted from the early days of the fight to prove tobacco harmful:
"The Canadian beverage sector is committed as an industry to providing a variety of products for every lifestyle and occasion through our expanding portfolio of low-and no-calorie beverages, smaller package sizes and through our voluntary, national industry calorie label initiative, Clear on Calories, that provides clear calories information on front of pack to enable informed purchasing decisions and consumption"
Mr. Sherwood failed to make this play (though he did make it here)
Mr. Sherwood failed to make this play (though he did make it here)
"Contrary to the vast amounts of nutritional science available, the article, based on one controversial study, inaccurately tries to paint the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages as a direct contributor to obesity, heart disease and diabetes."
Mr. Sherwood failed to make this play (though he did make it here)
"Research shows that no one single food or beverage can be linked to obesity, and scientific evidence does not support that sugar, in any of its various forms, is a unique cause of any health condition."
"No one single food or beverage alone is responsible for people being overweight or obese. All calories count from whatever food or beverage they come from."
Mr. Sherwood failed to make this play (though he did make it here)
Of course not.
For a brief summary of literature, here's one from Harvard's Frank Hu.
I'm not sure how much money Mr. Sherwood takes home each year but I sure hope it's a great deal. It'd have to be in order to make up for the impact his statements must have on how folks might perceive him as a person.
Kelly D. Brownell, & Kenneth E. Warner (2009). Big Tobacco Played Dirty and Millions Died. How Similar Is Big Food? The Milbank Quarterly, 87 (1), 259-294 PMID: 19298423
[For those interested, I've posted Mr. Sherwood's remarks below in their entirety as I couldn't seem to find a way to link. They were published in the London Free Press on April 10th, 2012 and a hat tip to blog reader Gay for sending my way]
"I read with interest the article, "Sugar can be found in unexpected places (April 9 2012)" in The London Free Press. Contrary to the vast amounts of nutritional science available, the article, based on one controversial study, inaccurately tries to paint the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages as a direct contributor to obesity, heart disease and diabetes.
The Canadian Beverage Association would like to provide scientific facts on the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages.
Research shows that no one single food or beverage can be linked to obesity, and scientific evidence does not support that sugar, in any of its various forms, is a unique cause of any health condition.
Statistics Canada's own data indicates that, full calorie soft drink consumption has declined by 30 per cent in the past 11 years but obesity continues to rise-these numbers alone show that there is no link between the two.
The international scientific community disagrees with the direct association of sugar consumption as the cause of health issues. For example; & From the Canadian Sugar Institute; "Through scientific reviews such as the Institute of Medicine Dietary Reference Intakes (DRI) report, does not support the view that sugar is "toxic" and a cause of non-communicable diseases"[1] <#_ftn1> & The Dietitians Association of Australia (DAA) "believes it is simplistic and unhelpful to blame sugar alone for rising obesity rates and other related health problems across the world"[2] <#_ftn2> & British Nutrition Foundation: "Current evidence does not support the dramatic claims about the association between sugar and health" [3] <#_ftn3> No one single food or beverage alone is responsible for people being overweight or obese. All calories count from whatever food or beverage they come from. The Canadian beverage sector is committed as an industry to providing a variety of products for every lifestyle and occasion through our expanding portfolio of low-and no-calorie beverages, smaller package sizes and through our voluntary, national industry calorie label initiative, Clear on Calories, that provides clear calories information on front of pack to enable informed purchasing decisions and consumption. "





Thank you kindly for this clearsighted critique of the sugar-using industry's pleasantries.
ReplyDeleteI find your link to Dr. Frank Wu's paper especially helpful.
It is interesting to note that, as reported in the nutrition blog here, the sugar content of Vitamin Water is in excess of 30 grams per bottle, which makes it more of a dessert than a beverage. Ditto for Coca Cola Classic and a bunch of juices.
My apologies for the typo: I meant, of course, Dr. Frank Hu!
Delete"No one single food or beverage alone is responsible for people being overweight or obese."
ReplyDeleteHow is this considered an argument? How about "No one single product alone is responsible for people developing lung cancer"? Should tobacco taxes then be eliminated because you can also get lung cancer naturally?
I suppose its meant to portray that all foods play an equal part, but it would be ludicrous to think that vegetables contribute as much as sugar does in the increase of obesity.
Wow. I wish I could say this information is shocking, but really it's not.
ReplyDeleteIt's sad to see that this industry is so stuck on trying to trick consumers into thinking that their sugar-filled products aren't a contributor to health problems. I mean, of course one cola isn't going to give you heart disease or make you obese, but opting for this instead of water, or replacing healthy choices with sugary beverages over the long term probably will.
And, while it's true that the general public should be able to make their own purchasing decisions, those decisions should also be informed ones, which it seems that the Canadian Beverage Associate is trying to prevent.
Spindoctor here. I regularly send out information/media responses that make me want to stab myself in the eye, due to their weakness/ridiculousness. Oh, the stories I wish I could tell.....
ReplyDeleteOne of my favourites is the "there are no good or bad foods" argument. Takes me back to an interview I had with Kelloggs where I was asked if I believed there was such a thing as a "bad food". As a health professional I couldn't bring myself to say "No", and no surprise, I didn't get the job (thank god).
ReplyDelete