There's a good reason why The 8-Hour Diet reads like a Men's Health magazine article - it was authored by David Zinczenko, former Editor in Chief of Men's Health magazine. The hyperbole begins even before the book does. Here's the jacket cover (Caps lock and bolding theirs),
"In just 6 weeks you're going to have your best body ever. You'll be LEANER, HEALTHIER, MORE ENERGETIC. You'll have the flat, firm belly you've always wanted. You'll sleep better, think more clearly-and have much better sex. You'll look younger, feel younger, and dramatically cut your risk of the major diseases of our time.The promise of the book is simple. Here's Zinczenko's version of it taken from the very first 3 pages of the book,
You'll lose weight faster than ever-as much as 5 pounds a week-without restricting calories OR giving up your favourite foods."
"Imagine the freedom that would come from being able to do whatever you want, eat whatever you want and know - not think, not hope, but know for certain - that you'll never gain another pound."And that message of eating as much as you want of whatever you want (who wouldn't want that in a weight loss plan?) is reinforced over, and over again throughout the book,
"Eat whatever you want as much as you want. But only eat during an 8-hour period each day (with a few cheats thrown in here and there!).
"And the most remarkable thing of all: You only have to follow the diet 3 days a week. Three days a week!"
"In fact the only challenge to the 8-Hour Diet is finding time to eat lots of delicious food. Heck, you should probably put your favorite barbecue joint on speed dial - just so you can satisfy your most gluttonous cravings at the touch of a button!"Of course there a tiny bit more to it, and I'll get to that in a bit, but first the science.
There is science backing up intermittent fasting (fast intermittently for 16 or more hours and then eat). Like all areas of research, some of the science is stronger than others, some is weak, and some is crippled by poor methodologies or statistics, however unlike most of the diet books I've recently read, Zinczenko doesn't provide us with his actual references (so if you were interested you could check out the data for yourself) despite virtually every page concluding on the basis of one uncited study or another that certain foods are "Fat Busters", or "Health Boosters", or that fasting improves every last aspect of your life, weight and metabolism. I wonder if part of his reticence to include his sources is the fact that much of the research that has been done on fasting has been done on fasts that are longer, and hence perhaps not applicable, to his 16 hour recommendations, or that the studies themselves while interesting, may not be as conclusive as he's suggesting.
What's also upsetting is the fact that Zinczenko makes no mention of a man named Martin Berkhan. Martin is a Swedish bodybuilder who as far as I'm aware, is the first person to lay out The 8-Hour Diet. Here's an excerpt from Martin's first blog posting from June 15th, 2007,
"the protocol consists of a fasting period, lasting 16 hours. This means you initiate your first meal 16 hours before eating the last meal on the night before (which is easily done by skipping breakfast and lunch). Thus, ideally all eating is done within an 8 +-1 hour timeframe."Pretty much identical to the protocol Zinczenko is promoting. It's almost inconceivable that Zinczenko wasn't aware of Martin's work as Martin's a very well known guy in the fitness/body building world. I think I first came across Martin's work on intermittent fasting back in 2008 and of course I'm nowhere near as keyed in to the fitness scene as Zinczenko, for as he himself notes,
"I've been working as a health journalist for more than half my life. You name an issue - absorption rates of minerals, causes of metabolic syndrom, funding for prostate cancer research, omega-3 versus omega-6 ratios - and if it has something to do with health or wellness, I'll usually have the background on it. I'm not the world's top expert on everything, but chances are, I know the world's top expert"Which in the case of the The 8-Hour Diet is almost certainly Mr. Berkhan.
As far as the diet itself goes, when you get to that section suddenly there are a few more rules than simply an all-you-can-eat buffet of whatever you want for 8 hours a day. Zinczenko wants you to, at each meal or snack, eat two of his eight "Powerfoods" which include lean sources of protein, nuts, yogurt and other dairy, legumes, berries, fruit, green leafy vegetables, and whole grains. Looking at his meal plan I crunched calories. Because his recipes include calories (I wish every diet book's recipes did, kudos to Zinczenko) I crunched every day. If you follow his 7-day meal plan, you'll average 1,595 calories. From a low of 1,222 to a high of 1,805. Breakfast perplexed me some. After all breakfast is literal here - you're breaking your 16 hour fast and presumably you're rather hungry which is likely why Zinczenko notes of his,
"I tuck into my fast-breaking meal - whatever time of the day it falls in with gusto - Ditto the other major meal I have during my 8-hour eating time. But there's only so much one stomach can hold, so I make sure I plan my foods carefully",Clearly Zinczenko is suggesting his breakfasts are rather large as, "there's only so much one stomach can hold", yet his suggested meal plan includes breakfasts that are at once incredibly low in both calories and volume. For instance he has you "tucking in with gusto" to smoothies with less than 200 calories, or to a few lonely blueberry pancakes clocking in at 315.
In the 8-Hour Diet, the conjecture, ridiculous metaphors and hyperbole, like a sweaty, red-faced, whistle-wearing, 1950s gym teacher on an overweight boy trying to climb the rope, come at you hard and heavy throughout (see, I can write that way too), but my favorite stretch had to be when Zinczenko backs up his 8-Hour Diet by means of suggesting Moses, Jesus, Buddha, and Muhammed, were big fans,
"Maybe that's why eating the 8-Hour Diet way has been popular with the great minds of the last many millennia. The scientific evidence for this diet is new, but wiser men than me have been following a similar type of eating for eons. The Big Four of religion - Moses, Jesus, Buddha, and Muhammed - all practiced and promoted fasting, and chances are they knew a thing or two more than we do."If you read the 8-Hour Diet's reviews on Amazon you'll see quite a mixed bag with many of the negative reviews talking of the diet's lack of efficacy. Truly, if you take Zinczenko at his word and treat the diet as an eat whatever you want for 8 hours a day lose weight diet, I think you'll be disappointed. Our environment doesn't lend itself to being blindly indulgent. Single meals out can easily contain over 3,000 calories and even while eating in, if not doing the cooking and thoughtfully navigating your choices, the calories can add up incredibly quickly. And if you struggle controlling calories on the 8-Hour Diet, I'm not sure the book will be much help. While it does have a section on 100 ways to cut out the calories they include such things as, "Watch a funny YouTube video", "When a craving strikes, make a fist", "Call your Mom", "Just breathe", "Read a thriller", "Flip through old photo albums", "Play "Words with Friends"", "Chew ice", "Light up candles scented with peppermint, banana, green apple and vanilla", "Watch traffic on the highway", and my favorite by far, "Clean the toilet".
To sum up, there is indeed some young science, much of it still theoretical, behind fasting as a means to improve health, and some studies too suggesting it may be useful in weight management. That said, I've yet to see any long term studies which given the fact that fasting is in and of itself, for many (though certainly not all), a form of suffering, I wonder about the attrition rate over time for fasting approaches. If you're interested in trying a 16 hour a day fasting style diet certainly you can pick up The 8-Hour Diet....or you could head over to Martin Berkhan's Leangains and read through the reams of freely available information he's been posting on his 8 hour diet since 2007, and a good place to start would be his Leangains Guide.





Umm...You may not be getting more free books from publishers if you keep writing reviews like this. Don't get me wrong - it's a well written review. It's just not going to help sell books. (I know that's not your goal.)
ReplyDeleteMaybe mine would sell better if I used "conjecture, ridiculous metaphors and hyperbole."
-Steve
Good mention of Martin Berkhan. Tragic rip-off to make money of someone else's job.
ReplyDeleteI agree Dr. Parker, but it's better he just keeps shooting straight as he's always done.
ReplyDeleteIt's obvious Dr. Parker is being intentionally sarcastic.
ReplyDeleteStudying weight loss marketing is something of a hobby for me. It's always about what sells, not what works. It's particularly intriguing to compare a diet book's selling points to its content. Have "your best body ever in just six weeks"?? I get such a kick outta that stuff!!! Thanks for the chuckle, Dr. Freedhoff!
Thank you for reviewing these books, I was excited when I saw your tweet that you were going to review this one.
ReplyDeleteI am obese and still looking for an eating that fits my life and works. I did a variation of IF a few months ago before this book came out, but I did 20 hours of fasting instead of 16, and I felt great. Greater mental clarity, more energy, steady weight loss, and not feeling restricted in my food choices (I generally eat healthy, just too much).
I stopped because I found some report (sorry, can't find it now) that over a long term, I.F. can affect hormone levels adversely (lowering). Being a female that will be entering menopause in a few years, I'm concerned that by losing fat this way, I'll end up damaging something else.
Have you or your readers ever had experience with that? Any links that could clear up the dangers of long term IF would be appreciated.
Thank You
Hi Gwen,
DeleteI'm not aware of any long term conclusive studies on IF (though that doesn't mean there aren't any, just that I've never seen one).
Best of luck,
Yoni
I too have heard that IF is not recommended for women, though I can't tell you where I read this.
DeleteThank you for responding. I found the report I mentioned. It was for a short term study, and the results related to glucose response.
DeleteMartin Berkhan recommends shorter fasting times for women - 14 hours instead of 16. Other research has indicated that fertility in women can be adversely affected - theory as to why is that in ancestral times when food was scarce their bodies would down regulate fertility so there wouldn't be more mouths to feed. Also leaves more energy for finding food . . .
DeleteIt amazes me that after decades of fad diets selling themselves on these obviously false promises, people are still buying it. Six weeks to a flat belly? But what if someone is 100 pounds overweight? Who believes that???
ReplyDeleteAnd it seems like quite the bait and switch to promise being able to have the bbq place on speed dial and then having people drink a smoothie for breakfast. A lot of people on fitocracy are on an IF diet but what I can tell is that it still takes a lot of discipline to make sure that even though you're eating big meals you're eating properly.
decades of fad diets? it is a scam as old as civilization, all you need to do is market something as being easy to do and with a big payoff of desired results, desperate people will throw money at you. does not matter if it is a diet, a medicine, a guide to making money, etc.
Deleteit is nothing but a scam to exploit dumb people. the only ones to truly blame are people who fall for the scams, they allow the scams to work in the first place.
- typed on my phone so ignore any typos or mistakes, cant be perfect on my dang droid
I can guarantee that this diet is not a scam I have been on it for 4 months and have lost 31 pounds eating healthy and as the diet calls for. including only doing 10 minutes of cardio everyday that I'm on a diet
DeleteOver at LeanGains Martin goes on a veiled tirade about the release of the 8 hour diet and, given that Men's Health had an article about a year or two ago on IF (which if I remember correctly was written by Peter Moore and referenced both LeanGains and EatStopEat), I suspect that the original intent was to include Martin as an author, but the need to simplify what is (at least for the full on LeanGains protocols [BCAA supplementation, carb cycling, etc.]) a complicated system caused Martin to leave the project.
ReplyDeleteAnd, to be frank, what is different about a book marketing a quick fix and some of the commercials I see on TV feeds from the US about how bariatric surgery is a 'quick fix' with no discussion of the follow up needed?
What "TV feeds" are promoting bariatric surgery as a "quick fix"??? Perhaps you could come out from behind anonymity and explain your claim?
DeleteI can assure you Martin was never part of this equation.
DeleteEat Stop Eat (e-book) by Brad Pilon of Hamilton is another IF approach similar to above.....with references.
ReplyDeleteThat's what I thought of when I came across this post. So I guess more than one person has tried to rip of Martin Berkhan. Shame on these people.
DeleteMay be it is beneficial but there is one demerit some people may feel craving in the night time, which will make them eat more. And also it may not go with some health problems. For me "eat less but frequently" is getting good results.
ReplyDeleteDavid Zc#%&*$!co is such a hack! His premise that if we "Eat This" junky processed food as a substitution for a "Not That" junky processed food (with a few additional calories) perpetuates fat bias and other cultural mythology. It gives permission to thin people who somehow can eat that crap to scorn people who get fat on it. He just makes my blood boil.
ReplyDeleteGood review. It just doesn't seem very healthy to me. There is no real replacement for the tried and true. Calories in vs. calories out.
ReplyDeleteIsn't it amazing that people still buy into claims like "in just 6 weeks you're going to have [...] the flat, firm belly you've always wanted"?
ReplyDeleteThe 220 lbs guy is in six weeks certainly not going to have the belly he always wanted, if that means having a six-pack. Even when he lost enough weight to make the abs potentially visible, he would very likely still require surgery to reduce the excess skin.
I just read the book. A few major red flags stood out.
ReplyDelete1. The personal "testimonials" to the diet's efficacy were never longer than 6 weeks duration, and never more than 15 to 20 pounds lost in those 6 weeks, with most in the lower range. So… what about the longer term? What happens at 8 weeks or 3 months? Do people keep losing or not?
2. While it's often claimed in the book that one can eat whatever one wants as long as it's within the 8 hour window, there are also other comments here and there indicating that one should eat moderately and not nosh out heavily on unhealthy high calorie foods. So, which is it? Logic tells me that one cannot eat whatever one wants, overindulging without thought, and that the 16 hours of fasting will take care of those calories and people will still lose. There's a huge difference in allowing oneself a cookie during the 8 hours and eating a whole batch. A giant sausage, egg, pancake breakfast dripping with fat and syrup has many more calories than a small protein and fruit smoothy.
3. There are numerous comments that one doesn't have to do more than walk briskly 8 minutes prior to breaking fast, usually in the morning. But in fact, the latter part of the book, from page 196 to page 261, is devoted to exercises one should do.
4. Almost nothing is said about alcohol consumption.
5. Cheating is, in fact, almost encouraged, with the admonition to just fast later on. That's an invitation to flexibility... so flexible, in fact, that it pretty much negates the program.
So, while IF may be useful if couple with moderation, the jury is definitely still out on this as a long term formula for success.
Interesting review - lots of "food" for thought. Just one point about your comment, "fasting is in and of itself...a form of suffering". My impression is that this is the most painless way to fast since at least half of the fasting time is spent sleeping. I read the book and thought the basic premise was sensible - three square meals per day with a period of rest during the night. A whole lot less suffering than all day deprivatuion.
ReplyDeleteHowever, I do agree with others that this book encourages cheating. I think this type of eating would be a good way to control weight, only if the underlying diet is sound and balanced. The notion that any kind of health can be achieved by eating gobs of junk for 8 hours and then fasting it off is inane. But for people who are eating a quality diet and still not losing weight, this is worth a shot.
Personally, I don't believe that moderate fasting is inherently unhealthy. It has been deliberately practiced by thousands for centuries, both for health and religious reasons. I have practiced fasting myself and have benefited both physically and spiritually for more than half a century.
Some of my own fasts have been long and difficult, but this practice of 16 hours of fasting daily seems mild to me, and at first, I wasn't sure why it was even called a fast since true fasting doesn't even set in for about 72 hours. So I am a little puzzled about where the "deprivation" is. To me, this just seems like normal eating with a late breakfast and no snacking after supper.
Loved this review! Read a brief promotional article in Women's Health Mag and appreciate a more grounded look at the diet.
ReplyDeleteI once lived in a barn (don't ask) and with no fridge, I could not store food. So I always ate my last meal of the day (usually a convenience store sandwich) at about 5 p.m. and had nothing but water until breakfast. I lost weight fairly easily and quickly, even though I never counted calories and ate a lot during the day. So there could be something to this.
ReplyDelete